How I view the world of cosmic differences of Clinton vs Trump, setting aside sex and bias and my/our personal self-interests.
Clinton is definitely a consummate politician, having spent her life so far in that tumultuous arena, and a seasoned lawyer, too. As such she is much nuanced in all the known intricacies of the political game, both within and even beyond ethics or our perceived morality. And she may even be perceived as unscrupulous or amoral in the dogged pursuit of political correctness (imagine her unequivocal support for late-term abortion). Making use of all these means and more, she with her nuclear family have survived all “the slings and arrows of outrageous fortunes”. And their collective past has been typified and littered with very dark and foreboding episodes, among them the Lewinsky case, the humiliating impeachment, Benghazi, the stealthy maintenance of a private email server, blatant lies caught and revealed, etc.; and at times literally littered with dead bodies. But they have weathered them all, and have even been generously rewarded with financial largesse.
Trump however is essentially a businessman, not a politician and thus an outlier, and maybe more an entertainer given his most recent pursuits and avocation; but, he is definitely all in pursuit of self-interests and self-satisfaction. Given his orientation he is known to be brusque, brutish, unrefined in the eyes of polite society. Political correctness is not in his vocabulary, maybe because his outsized ego will not permit it.
His track record is also laid bare and naked, a record also quite checkered in many respects. Many public bankruptcies, associations with gambling and casinos, and the unhappy trails of many suits filed against him and his enterprises. But he too weathered all of them, and as testimony he continues to swim in the lap of luxury and opulence.
In both cases, the rule of law of men smiled at them. And withheld harsh judgment, though whether justly or unjustly who is to say.
One defining difference in the comparison though is that Trump in all this pursued his own personal interests, while that of Clinton was all done under the noble shield of public service.
Remember too in public service one tries to do great service to gain approbation, self-contentment, and of course, votes during elections. But in business, the standard and measure is essentially how rich and influential one has become.
Being now in the same arena, supposedly all in the name of self-less and altruistic service, we will find Clinton so at home and comfortable in her own skin; while Trump unless he realizes the importance of this delineation, will flounder and not be easy on the eyes and minds of the electorate at large. He has to take on the role and accoutrements required in the political game. He chose freely to enter, as it were, into the lion’s den. It is his to adjust and adapt, or be unceremoniously set aside.
Their married lives have also been grist for the mill in this campaign. And what can one say. Except both are so not in the ordinary, or are unusual and technicolored. And neither one would be happy to discuss or revel in the subject during fireside chats with family and friends, especially conservative older folks.
Though children ought not to be dragged in, but since both chose to bring them in, then they too became fodder for media and committed supporters.
Records would show that Chelsea has led a quite sheltered life, not having to go through any period of privation. Went to excellent schools, and when done given a very cushy job with benefits that would pop the eyes of any jobseeker. And when time to get married, everything in high-fashionable style and luxurious elegance, complete with a 10million dollar abode. A very far cry from the humble beginnings of Bill Clinton in Hope, Arkansas.
Having married at least 3 times, Trump has several children. The adult ones work under the Trump array of enterprises. I suppose they all went to excellent schools, too, and when done immediately installed as critical players in their organization. Listening to the ones who are in the public sphere, they appear to acquit themselves creditably in personality, manners, and cognitive abilities. I add this because I know little of them, unlike Chelsea who has been in the limelight since childhood.
It is safe to say that probably it is a harder task being part of an organization that could either profit or lose, than just be employed in a big company or tag along with your parents during political sorties, or personal trips, or etc.
Given all the above, where do our fears of selection stand? And are they still valid and founded? As I had declared earlier, between the 2, I favor Trump. And it is not founded by fears for or against either, for any way we live with fears and uncertainties daily in our lives. We ought to learn and manage and continue our lives in tandem with them.
What about their politics?
That would take a novel-size treatise.
So in a most microscopic synopsis. Hillary represents the revolution started by Obama, to “fundamentally change the US of A”; and Trump represents all that the US was before, and going back would make “America great again”.
The details are all eschewed, assisted in no small measures by unscrupulous supporters essentially coming from one side assisted by water-carrying media. And this technique has not only spawned the current fears, but the outright violence we see in the streets that articulates the divides between the races, and the haves and have-nots.
The question then is:
Do we like what we see or do we want a return to what it was?