Thursday, December 31, 2020

A MINOR CLASH OF CIVILIZATIONS, OR SIMPLY, DIFFERENCES IN MORAL VALUES?


This has been bubbling underneath for quite a while, more like for the last 65 years.  And it is still as fresh and intense as the earliest period when all this unraveled. It had stayed uninvited in my mind all this time, kept stowed in the back burner but at times surfacing and loitering in my waking hours.

First let us line up the protagonists, or the actors in this bit of melodrama.  The dominant player one could say was a young Jesuit scholastic coming from the mighty US of A, who had nobly volunteered to spend time and service in the Philippines, far away and quite removed from the progress and development enjoyed in his blessed country.  Inspired we surmised with the gallant purpose of bringing good American education and the words of the Gospels to a fledging country that had leaned decidedly Christian Catholic.

On the other side would be me, middle child of nine siblings, quite timid and overly introverted; keeping pretty much to myself though possessed of a mind that was ever on high gear daydreaming or thinking fanciful things about the world.  And thus I had always asked the intriguing question: Does timidity encourage bouts of fantasy role-playing?

The two protagonists invariably meet almost in an inadvertent way.  I did not ask to be born and at the very least, he was unaware of what he was getting into, other than what he had understood about his own culture and morality.  And of course, he was on a life mission that was noble and commendable.

While my milieu and the particular circumstances that nurtured me would create the kind of person I would grow up to be, he had spent time growing up in a somewhat idealized way, raised by Catholic parents and in very empowered working class setting, and educated in the rigid Catholic tradition up to his college years.  Equipped we suppose of the moral tools and habits designed to produce other good Catholic kids, even those coming from different backgrounds.   Like kids like me.

Anyway he came to my life as a HS junior, a time when I was pretty much left to my own devices and at that time beginning to show nonchalance and listlessness about the formal education process. And I had instead taken easy interest in being part of a close-knit group of my own contemporaries and school mates.  Feeling comfortable in an existence with minimal structure and boundaries, which were not judged necessarily bad or good.  Just enough to get by and stay out of trouble in general.  And liberally free from many constricting rules to follow and keep.

That was the externality of that existence, because inside I had countless daydreams that occupied me and somehow desired some realization or fulfillment.  Dreams of being looked up to because of certain skills and smarts, like possessed of good writing skills, looking physically good, with admirable skills in public acting, singing, and orating.  And more, as gleaned and captivated by the celluloid idols of my days. In that world, it seemed that traditional moral issues were not only practiced selectively but some maybe frozen in time. So it was deemed okay to take some available shortcuts to arrive at certain results. And this applied even to regular school work.

So did not think much about plagiarizing English translations of Latin passages from a kept-secret book borrowed from the library, or imitating writing styles or words from some articles read, etc.  Or justifying keeping stuff found simply dismissing them as rewards under the catch-all justification, finders keepers.  Or taking small things without asking. Any small thing to gain advantage and insignificant enough not to raise any tinge of conscience. In short, somewhat morally ambivalent with regard to small stuff which in my mind then did not really mean much.

With almost dull cadence I went through my high school days in some kind of mindless but directed  existence.  Insufferably doing just enough to pass through schooling, though trying to excel at a few endeavors that I considered I could make something out of.

That kind of dull existence led to less than satisfactory school work, which did not really faze me, nor meant anything much to me.  School at that stage was simply a process that I tolerated.  Not really thinking about it as part of a greater future.  But who cared.

Anyway, one day a few weeks before the end of school as things were being wrapped, I received an unexpected surprise in my young timid life.  I received back a regular notebook where we wrote translations of our Latin textbook, and submitted regularly for grading by the teacher.  On the empty page where the last translation work ended were emblazoned the following words coming from the teacher:  This is to certify that Amadeo V. Neri, Jr. is a complete failure for the year.  And signed in full by the author.  No explanation.  My world dropped and got so aimlessly stunned I did not know how to react.

Kept the notebook to myself, and showed it only to my mates in our gang.  Made no move and was not made to account for it by the teacher.  While we continued to meet casually, no mention from either of us of the incident was made.  The  year ended and I did get a passing grade for that Latin subject.  The crux of that matter may have been that the prior year I received a silver medal for being the best in Latin.  That probably triggered the outright consternation and condemnation.  This thorn was necessarily in the forefront for another year since I still had to go through senior year of HS, which year got progressively worse.  But who cared.   In short, I made it through HS, though because of shortcomings was not allowed to go through graduation exercises.  But who cared.

And I find that over the years whatever few talents I have discovered in me I have tried to explore and exploit in all possible ways. Like in drawing, in writing, and most everything else I do I do with the end in view of making sure that I project my best efforts.  Resolving to bring out my best in the tasks I do, like in work or simply in living my life as a single person and as father of a family.  This in a way tells me and people too that I always try to bring out the best in me in whatever I do, and have been doing this on my own and in the best morally possible and decent way I know how.  

Though still certain available shortcuts may have been undertaken, it was always with the end in view of benefiting other people and not me.  The considered moral lapses are justified in my mind and thus am not troubled too much by conscience, though  when I was younger there was a point when I considered these lapses I could never justify.  And of course, the fear of being caught pushed hard on me.  However, I have been fortunate to not be caught in compromising situations, and had been able to justify that maybe that is God’s way of telling me to take it easy, though it is really not that bad.  Else I would have been punished early on.  Still this troubles me and gnaws at me, making me more tentative or fearful in engaging in such lapses.  Though I have been very careful and deliberate when I think and decide on these things, and allow time and effort to lapse and slow down before actually doing it.

In later years most of the earlier issues would change as maturity or awakening started to take hold.  And I would turn out to be almost like a different person after those intervening years.  And as I far as I knew we both would go our own separate ways.  Learned that my erstwhile mentor would continue his work in the homeland, and would actually spend his last years there.  He had been aside from more assignments in other Jesuit schools in the Philippines become focused in giving spiritual retreats, which are very important exercises in the Jesuit schools and communities.  He had written several books on the subjects relevant to them, and I had even acquired and read several of those books.

In the back of my mind I had always desired that one day I would like to talk to him about that forgotten traumatic incident in high school that remained hanging without proper explanation and closure all these years.  A possibly convenient occasion popped up when I learned that he was invited by another HS classmate to join us in our 50th reunion. Never got the chance since he failed to join us for the reunion, and I learned that some months later that he had quietly passed on in his adopted homeland.

So any closure to be done at this stage would remain to be virtual and alas, just a figment of the imagination. 

And there may be a couple more that I am working on, working toward unraveling them and seeking closure.

And this we need to do till we breathe last.


 





Sunday, December 13, 2020

Trump After Trump

 

Wouldn’t it be artful irony, or even karmic revenge, if in the next four years Trump with his ubiquitous presence, memory, or as they say, his “antics”, would continue to reside in the inert wakefulness of all those who deride and loathe him?  Enjoying free and permanent lease inside their heads?  Though he typically wastes no time in responding to any criticism leveled at him, we know Trump has been masterful taking such unkind offerings in good stride.

It seems only fair for this to ensue.  After all the four years of the Trump presidency have been characterized by the numerous and incessant gauntlets thrown at him by his rabid opposition from all directions.  And not a single one stuck to convict him.

And no doubt whoever sits in the throne, the next four years will be one big truckload of daunting challenges from the resistant pandemic to the manifold global economic challenges. And at this stage, there is no discernible daylight at the end of the tunnel. Never mind the growing threats of bellicose intervention coming from the great powers. Failure therefore will be one calculated reality having a rightful place in any negotiating table, for those seated around it and tasked with the tough decisions to be made.

As we speak, even as they incessantly declare that Trump is in the dismal clutches of ignominious rebuffs on many legal fronts, he still is their main focus of criticism and derision, sparing no ink and paper in critique of a supposed gnat.  They seem not able to get enough of him.  And we know too well, how it is when thinking ill of another is one’s main preoccupation.  He who promotes it will likely suffer more than the target.  Such indignation will gnaw and eat away at the very core of those who promote them for a living.

And Trump, now emboldened by the solid following of half of the electorate will no doubt take chockfull advantage of that privilege.  Remember when he started his political life, even his own declared party did not accept him.  Even those who were socially allied disowned him.  This and what he had collectively accomplished prior to this debilitating pandemic, will no doubt accrue in his favor, giving him a sterling legacy to leave behind.  And overall, we no doubt will see that history will be kinder to this man.  It cannot be any other, given the facts as historical bases. It will be a depiction more reasonable and fair than what his many detractors are attributing to him now.

And in passing, we know they are all against Trump and whatever he was done.  Yet this late, we are still not seeing or knowing what exactly do they stand for.  Other than the lifelong devotion to the many narrow vested interests the unholy alliances of the cadre of oligarchs, tech elites, media pundits, even socialist anarchists, etc. are committed to and for which the public undoubtedly do not really care for or about.  Or if they do, they do not redound to any desirable benefit for them. The reason then, nobody is articulating what they stand for in terms of actual beneficial programs for the collective? 

And they have piously limited themselves to making motherhood statements about the good and welfare of the country, people, and politics.  All, white-wash paint sprayed on sepulchers!  Pregnant with verbosity, but very lean on actionable programs that could work.

Anyhow, all this will also pass into history, stowed in the past which will be forgotten by present generations.  But there will always be that hardy band of serious historians in the future who will exhume all this, if only to highlight the recidivist nature of man.  This 2020 election for all the hoopla it has generated will be most remembered for the massive and pervasive voter/electoral frauds inflicted on an aging system ripe for scavenging and/or collapse.  Unfortunately, the search for truth was not that sharp and keen to a languid generation weaned on instant gratification and satisfaction.  So let the sunlight shine another day! 

 

 

Sunday, November 29, 2020

Man’s Many Uses of Literature

 

Even in this muddled day and age, the poet William Shakespeare continues to be   held in high affection for many reasons.  And it is no difficult task to cite a couple.

He was a great story-teller, creating stunning poetry of otherwise dreary real events that figured prominently in our history.  Secondly, the English language he wrote in was substantially enhanced by him via his prodigious skills as a wordsmith, creating over a thousand new words which have been zealously added to the lexicon.  With his contributions he truly enriched the language in very significant ways.

One could then delve into the frame of mind he wrote his immortal pieces.  Did he write for his own satisfaction and appreciation, or pride, displaying phenomenal skills not enjoyed by many?  In other words, did he write to express and pursue his deep passions for writing to enable him to see how far and how deeply he could develop such skills?  And in the process also revel in having produced notable pieces of art.  The utter joys of the beaming artisan in front of his own creation!

We are quite conversant with the intimate connections of literature with mysticism, embodying in both the author’s grand vision and ambitions, his consuming restlessness and dissatisfaction with life as lived.  Though he also finds joys and delight at the creative discoveries of his own handiwork.

Or did he write pursuing commercial ends?  Did he live an opulent style producing those beautiful poetic works?  This is highly doubtful, as well as I suppose for most noted writers of the past eras.

Or did he write essentially so other people would be able to read them and understand for the reasons he wrote them?  His many poetic works are truly beautiful uses of the written word. But can we be certain that our own interpretation of each of them jibes with the author’s?  How can we tell with certainty?  Or maybe just possibly?

One likes to believe that one other plausible reason he may have written his works in the ways he did was because he also wanted to find how people would comprehend him writing in the very unique and novel style that he had developed.  Like a riddle, he wanted to find out if indeed they could understand them for the same reasons he wrote them, writing in his own most personal and unusual style.  A style so unique and different from others, one could say he was peerless and thus stood alone in that one particular sphere.  And for this matter then, maybe every other poet of note and consequence also wrote with this one thing in mind, in a style so personal and unique there is no other like it.

In the realm of oral language, we talk about professionals who engage in the exposition and interpretation of body language, analyzing speech in the context of or in relation to their body movements.  Couldn’t one also use that to analyze the written works of poets and writers and derive some sense of why and how they wrote their works?  In other words, did their words as written convey any sense of purpose why they wrote them, or even whether their words reveal their mental state?  Many say that Edgar Allan Poe’s dark life somehow spilled over to his body of works.  Dark and dreary as we are inclined to feel in his notable works.

Or it could be as cut and dried as we are told that the reason El Greco painted the way he did was because he may have had problems of his vision making him see real images in odd symmetry.

The point to convey is that we cannot discount the fact that certain people may write for the purpose of trying to find out if their intended readers could comprehend their writings the way they were intended to.

It is also possible that people write in such a way that they can hide their true purposes for their work, as an exercise of shielding their own privacy with regard to certain things.  Thus, those people write stuff though available to the public but intended secretively only for their own personal purposes.

Thus, for those of us who write on a regular basis, and more than just weaving together several sentences at a time, but at least writing regularly essay length treatises, we can ask ourselves that question.  How and for what reason do we write?

I once wrote a very mundane piece on the local traffic and had primarily wanted to eschew actual conditions in unrealistic ways to depict how bad and frustrating traffic was to me personally. So a piece written with so much irony and tongue-in-check.  Or maybe even oozing a bit with sarcasm.

One perceptive anonymous commenter expressed that my attempt showed I was trying too hard so much so that the piece had instead totally failed as a serious commentary of a real-life situation.  In honesty, I took the critique graciously for truly I believe I can learn even more listening to those who read my pieces.  It was the anonymity that did not sit well with me, because it implied I could not take any criticism and would thus be irked.  But this was not the case.

Anyway, this is one clear instance when the reason one writes a piece is at cross-purposes with those who read it.  And I as the author could definitely say that the reader missed the point.  This illustrates the case I am trying to hypothesize regarding intended reasons why a piece is written.  And could only be known by the author.  Thus, possibly in an obtuse way, the author may be hiding the real purposes why he wrote.

I do at times write to test how or how deeply the reader would understand what I can trying to convey.  Thus, while it may not be too easily discernible upon first blush, the wished-for hope is that a serious rereading of the piece could expose the deeper intent embedded in the piece.

A piece written very straightforwardly or too declaratively may appear too blunt, or too rude, for those targeted.  The circumspection could help soften the at times caustic message. 

 

 

Thursday, November 26, 2020

WHEN SOMEBODY DEPARTS

 



WHEN SOMEBODY DEPARTS

 

When somebody departs from this world,

we the living are made to rue and even to regret

if we had been derelict in the temporal niceties

of properly bidding farewell to the deceased.

 

Like saying our tearful good-byes.

Reconciling if we had unresolved issues.

Conveying love by word of mouth,

 Or paying homage to that relationship.  

 

I say there is a lot more to life than this.

That is, of a contented or thorough life.

 

All memories are of the mind.

And they embrace both real actions witnessed,

 or those fancied and simply desired.

 

Even the process of reconciliation,

or saying our fond farewell,

 or even our love, starts with the mind.

 

Once started it fuses as an integral part of us,

Inseparable, to be remembered and cherished.

 

That is the beauty and splendor of our species,

for we can both be physical and/or transcendent

 

In the end, what is in the mind is more momentous,

and telling for the living.

 

We are lovingly survived by their fondness,

 and continue to treasure life because of their clinginess.

 

All noble actions desired need not all come to fruition.

Sufficient is the desire and resolve to pursue them.

Sunday, November 22, 2020

Braver New World: From Henceforward

 

In a grander display for the entire world to observe, the last 2020 US Presidential elections ushered in a world in politics never witnessed before, and quite unlike one has ever seen.

A most unique brand of power politics so far-reaching and powerful, no known competition could stand in its wake.  Unique also in its composition of players allied and conscripted for the sole purpose of victory for its causes.  Though it thought it had a good handle of it, in the end the opposition not only stood helpless, but stunned and stupefied not really knowing what hit them.  A brand of power politics so determined nothing was left off the table, whether legal or not, or less than honorable.

A political field that went beyond just two major parties duking it out, but most everybody engaged to play partisan politics in a very skewed or lopsided manner.  The traditional parties themselves were considered second-stringers, second-rate, and almost as minor players.  This was especially true with the Democratic Party which was allied with and was the designated sponsor to carry the banner of this very dominant force.

Who were the players involved in this game of power politics? A coterie of all the important and noteworthy sectors of this very rich and developed country.

In the 2016 derby, the same forces had been initially deployed, the very first time such was deployed, again with the Democratic Party candidate anointed to carry its banners.  Though formidable not only in finance but in following, still the outlier candidate of the other party won.  More because of the complacency of the left engendered by the very favorable odds given its choice. Nobody expected the outlier to win, thus the loss was even more stunning.

But in 2020, it was promised that victory would be assured by all means possible, or as they say, by hook or by crook.  And by crook indeed, it tried pouring their staggering millions into areas where they thought themselves weak.  Initial findings would suggest money alone was not sufficient to affect the results.  So we surmise extra-legal means could have been resorted toward their avowed ends.  After all money politics can easily sway or warp the moral senses of many. The massive mail-in and early voting schemes designed for this particular election, and executed by a number of states ruled by the party went into play.  Same with   hurried changes made on  election protocols to service and effectuate the new schemes deployed.   All these financed by easy money that flowed like a river.

What about trying to wrap our heads on all possible mind-blowing problems associated with the use of voting machines and software originating from shadowy places which are now front and center in the legal challenges now pending and being adjudicated?