Amid all the bright smiles and implied nods we see, we participate here not only as a
small voice, but also as a vestige of a past long gone and maybe forgotten. We like to add puny whispers to the
thunderous ones that we have heard from avowed stalwarts of the community. Weighty voices coming from leaders whose
reputation and renown have preceded them, giving them more sway and weight to validate
their oral judgments. From the beaming captains of local businesses and
industries, to the esteemed leaders of local government, to the revered
spokespersons of our educational, religious, and social institutions.
And we see that to a large extent there has
been unanimity in thought regarding the very ambitious and drastic development
plans the university has deigned to follow.
But we aim to tease and coax from them information about the time and
efforts expended by their honored selves in arriving at their conclusions. Because our small voice only has questions to
be asked, rather than more grandiose suggestions to add to the plans so
elaborately laid out.
Given the warm reception
given the development plans, we are confident that these leaders believe that
the city is not only in good hands but in a good place and thus fit and ready
to accommodate more developments of the sort we already witness locally. More tall buildings and malls for mixed uses
and by consequence, more traffic. And we
are confident further that these leaders are of this mind because of the
results of their actions in their respective fields in this regard. If this be so, we then proceed with our obviously
loaded questions.
Do all this and the results
they will necessarily engender address the many factors of the “livability”
index that a city or community ought to pay deference to? Let us count the ways, and begin with the
general.
How does all this affect the overall
livelihood of the community, especially those already less privileged and in
penury? To business/industry leaders and
local government, what has been done in the meantime to address and mitigate the
poverty levels under your own specific purview? Many believe the city has been remiss because
of the increasing levels of privation we witness around the city. And many have
observed not only here locally but most everywhere else that where developments of
this sort are initiated, that one unintended consequence has been that they are
exclusionary and thus discriminatory to the less privileged, with regard to
where they live and work, and their corresponding access to the new opportunities
to be opened.
Has the chaotic traffic and
parking situation improved enough to accommodate more? What about flooding? Is the general situation getting any better
so that we can say that more can be safely added?
What about plans or
implementation of zoning of different sectors of the community? Is local government paying attention to how
in general development is moving along?
How to spread development to take advantage of the big size of the
city. The city has the size of almost 450 sq.kms
and development is centered on a very small area. A question was once asked if
there was a master zoning plan of the city. Is there one and is it being
implemented?
Are all these even relevant
to a modern age where traditional normalcy has been upended? Maybe, disregard for all these concerns is
the new normal?
Anyway, only the future is
the final arbiter of whatever decisions are made in the present.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Welcome. Your comments are appreciated.